Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-02-11 20:46:57 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 0FED2C9FBBAD070C186193DEC0ADD04A6CC96009F3C6942BBBC2AE010D028B51
Participant Details

Original Note:

This is purely personal opinion with no reference to any disputable facts, note not needed An almost identical note by the same author appears in the preceeding tweet Note spam which verges on harassment is categorically not the purpose of Community Notes

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1624449993166950402
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 0FED2C9FBBAD070C186193DEC0ADD04A6CC96009F3C6942BBBC2AE010D028B51
  • createdAtMillis - 1676148417795
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 16244499931669504020FED2C9FBBAD070C186193DEC0ADD04A6CC96009F3C6942BBBC2AE010D028B51