Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-02-11 03:28:03 UTC - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 8C3DA58329CED963782C4A55E44CDCAF6B3F93A5A89FF28DFBFC9B2F9A99EF92
Participant Details

Original Note:

The FBI claims that this money was for subpoenas etc, and not their unconstitutional requests. But the FBI's history of dishonesty is a central issue here. It is a reasonable personal opinion to doubt their PR statement.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1624139625970413568
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 8C3DA58329CED963782C4A55E44CDCAF6B3F93A5A89FF28DFBFC9B2F9A99EF92
  • createdAtMillis - 1676086083132
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 16241396259704135688C3DA58329CED963782C4A55E44CDCAF6B3F93A5A89FF28DFBFC9B2F9A99EF92