Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-02-11 05:37:02 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 2BEE4A59A97C0A1B4EC0553E76304106889D32B9F243F95B76FB6D21FDC47291
Participant Details

Original Note:

The FBI claims that this money was for subpoenas etc, and not their unconstitutional requests. But the FBI's history of dishonesty is a central issue here. It is a reasonable personal opinion to doubt their PR statement.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1624139625970413568
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 2BEE4A59A97C0A1B4EC0553E76304106889D32B9F243F95B76FB6D21FDC47291
  • createdAtMillis - 1676093822326
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 16241396259704135682BEE4A59A97C0A1B4EC0553E76304106889D32B9F243F95B76FB6D21FDC47291