Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-02-10 00:24:04 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 755E6639CD2D25B3A281E3A0965C5BCBFBE72A8A9C59F95E0FE1B81D3265F2FE
Participant Details

Original Note:

Note is not needed due to the wording of the tweet. Author is speculating as to why the reader did not see this news, not claiming that there was no mainstream coverage. Rebuttals like this belong in the replies

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1623779260656762882
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 755E6639CD2D25B3A281E3A0965C5BCBFBE72A8A9C59F95E0FE1B81D3265F2FE
  • createdAtMillis - 1675988644975
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1623779260656762882755E6639CD2D25B3A281E3A0965C5BCBFBE72A8A9C59F95E0FE1B81D3265F2FE