Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-02-07 22:04:03 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 108311549FE763FAF65CF390E0100A40F4735B021CCB03A8012DD7A14374D5FA
Participant Details

Original Note:

The tweet merely displays The Guardian headline & a personal opinion of "coincidence". The previous note corrects the headline, which is irrelevant, since the article corrects its own headline. The difference in numbers isn't the responsibility of the tweet. No note is needed.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1622972537826324480
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 108311549FE763FAF65CF390E0100A40F4735B021CCB03A8012DD7A14374D5FA
  • createdAtMillis - 1675807443792
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1622972537826324480108311549FE763FAF65CF390E0100A40F4735B021CCB03A8012DD7A14374D5FA