Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-02-06 14:49:43 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: E8364D4BCE9191F3455B7FC1E061A26B3377D2BD69235507F0E0E38286152DA0
Participant Details

Original Note:

In ISOLATION, this tweet doesn’t need a note but because it’s now being shared by some passing blame and suggesting that someone SHOULD have done something because they were warned, it must be noted that there is no scientifically accepted (or reliable) way to predict quakes.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1622502895022399488
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - E8364D4BCE9191F3455B7FC1E061A26B3377D2BD69235507F0E0E38286152DA0
  • createdAtMillis - 1675694983007
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 1622502895022399488E8364D4BCE9191F3455B7FC1E061A26B3377D2BD69235507F0E0E38286152DA0