Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-02-06 13:18:32 UTC - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 007F601FFD830F1133BE0B16359E8B70A998721DF5AE85E99671C466A3C5A4C4
Participant Details

Original Note:

This tweet is an scientific opinion in an area unsettled science (whether earthquakes can be predicted) - not note needed, period. However, it turns out the prediction was, sadly, highly accurate. Therefore it was neither wrong nor misleading. https://twitter.com/CitizenFreePres/status/1622478058350596096?s=20&t=pEWfyw_uFZ4vVxRsUApp3g

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1622483374555435010
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 007F601FFD830F1133BE0B16359E8B70A998721DF5AE85E99671C466A3C5A4C4
  • createdAtMillis - 1675689512507
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1622483374555435010007F601FFD830F1133BE0B16359E8B70A998721DF5AE85E99671C466A3C5A4C4