Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-02-02 08:36:08 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 308EBAA948E0D9C325C847A3FD6C5604E77E218D7E6C8F38F570B2C00704C8C8
Participant Details

Original Note:

User is arguing with an AI automatically generating text. This is not a usual or correct application of the scientific method which in practice is for empirical observations & experiments There has been no peer-reviewed application of the scientific method into gender studies. https://www.britannica.com/science/scientific-method

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1621032082435723264
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 308EBAA948E0D9C325C847A3FD6C5604E77E218D7E6C8F38F570B2C00704C8C8
  • createdAtMillis - 1675326968436
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1621032082435723264308EBAA948E0D9C325C847A3FD6C5604E77E218D7E6C8F38F570B2C00704C8C8