Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-02-01 16:05:01 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: FD70610C6F5160D5ACE665BB6F00E495572E87BE3B0F8DAA40C501CF0ED406ED
Participant Details

Original Note:

"high risk of bias in the trials, variation [...], and [...] low adherence [...] during the studies hampers drawing firm conclusions." "There is a need for large, well‐designed RCTs addressing the effectiveness" Despite this Simon claims this is a firm stance to a negative. https://www.cochranelibrary.com/cdsr/doi/10.1002/14651858.CD006207.pub6/full

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1620726400272531458
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - FD70610C6F5160D5ACE665BB6F00E495572E87BE3B0F8DAA40C501CF0ED406ED
  • createdAtMillis - 1675267501364
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1620726400272531458FD70610C6F5160D5ACE665BB6F00E495572E87BE3B0F8DAA40C501CF0ED406ED