Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-02-01 14:32:45 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: BB62A82DF67EB3403C2670EAFED8A3C5F4566D2E71469D908BC05AB5241EF775
Participant Details

Original Note:

Meta analysis is not a good way to make a scientific analysis, meta-analysis pulls data from other studies, which each study has different baselines. The resultant paper is no longer a scientific paper its more of a guesstimate. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27209412/ it can be used as a template for a new study.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1620578047605760003
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - BB62A82DF67EB3403C2670EAFED8A3C5F4566D2E71469D908BC05AB5241EF775
  • createdAtMillis - 1675261965083
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 1620578047605760003BB62A82DF67EB3403C2670EAFED8A3C5F4566D2E71469D908BC05AB5241EF775