Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-02-01 01:40:38 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 785925B089F16F678F43B5E635008EEF8EF0B02445B35CAC2D88CB59C20EA725
Participant Details

Original Note:

Meta analysis is not a good way to make a scientific analysis, meta-analysis pulls data from other studies, which each study has different baselines. The resultant paper is no longer a scientific paper its more of a guesstimate. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27209412/ it can be used as a template for a new study.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1620578047605760003
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 785925B089F16F678F43B5E635008EEF8EF0B02445B35CAC2D88CB59C20EA725
  • createdAtMillis - 1675215638343
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1620578047605760003785925B089F16F678F43B5E635008EEF8EF0B02445B35CAC2D88CB59C20EA725