Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-01-31 15:10:34 UTC - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: F7FFB6E41D7648FEA6A328719C4CD4011CB1771BE8BC435C4259AD97AAFBF6D5
Participant Details

Original Note:

The paper is billed as a ‘legal opinion’, but it draws principally on MSM news stories (Guardian, Express etc) to illustrate points that are arguably more about the anti-Brexit authors frustrations with the impacts of Brexit, than matters of legal consequence.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1620336801150898176
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - F7FFB6E41D7648FEA6A328719C4CD4011CB1771BE8BC435C4259AD97AAFBF6D5
  • createdAtMillis - 1675177834187
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1620336801150898176F7FFB6E41D7648FEA6A328719C4CD4011CB1771BE8BC435C4259AD97AAFBF6D5