Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-01-31 14:46:49 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 7036B9689FD2599459F33BC8F6351800A6470CADA97CF19DDC69CDDE239E1911
Participant Details

Original Note:

The paper is billed as a ‘legal opinion’, but it draws principally on MSM news stories (Guardian, Express etc) to illustrate points that are arguably more about the anti-Brexit authors frustrations with the impacts of Brexit, than matters of legal consequence.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1620336801150898176
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 7036B9689FD2599459F33BC8F6351800A6470CADA97CF19DDC69CDDE239E1911
  • createdAtMillis - 1675176409685
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 16203368011508981767036B9689FD2599459F33BC8F6351800A6470CADA97CF19DDC69CDDE239E1911