Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-01-31 15:37:26 UTC - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: B1EBA38F5F5AF28B2EAAED8992C957399008A50A41FE3DF280361E018CA79F3B
Participant Details

Original Note:

Twitter actually preferenced conservative narratives with its algorithms. Not only was it studied by Twitter and MIT, but the Twitter study was published in a peer-reviewed journal. https://www.google.com/amp/s/thehill.com/opinion/technology/3273956-musk-says-twitter-is-biased-against-conservatives-facts-say-otherwise/amp/ https://www.economist.com/graphic-detail/2021/11/13/according-to-twitter-twitters-algorithm-favours-conservatives

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1620275602795429889
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - B1EBA38F5F5AF28B2EAAED8992C957399008A50A41FE3DF280361E018CA79F3B
  • createdAtMillis - 1675179446696
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1620275602795429889B1EBA38F5F5AF28B2EAAED8992C957399008A50A41FE3DF280361E018CA79F3B