Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-01-30 14:04:21 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: C706FC0C52118C6D760E159CCB2B5EF66D7EABFA50722FA5FFD3E73CC240D470
Participant Details

Original Note:

Reading the Seattle times evidence on one of the notes, it seems to conclude that it is inconclusive. I don't think that is enough to warrant a note.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1619783158232219651
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - C706FC0C52118C6D760E159CCB2B5EF66D7EABFA50722FA5FFD3E73CC240D470
  • createdAtMillis - 1675087461146
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1619783158232219651C706FC0C52118C6D760E159CCB2B5EF66D7EABFA50722FA5FFD3E73CC240D470