Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-01-29 06:54:26 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: D7A50A6314B2C43F85D6D2E3123B9D6D24A8B30786532196EDFD1D0AD4A21E2D
Participant Details

Original Note:

An “if” statement is not an objective claim about Republican intent and cannot be objectively refuted. A note would be inappropriate here.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1619562687461031936
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - D7A50A6314B2C43F85D6D2E3123B9D6D24A8B30786532196EDFD1D0AD4A21E2D
  • createdAtMillis - 1674975266920
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 1
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1619562687461031936D7A50A6314B2C43F85D6D2E3123B9D6D24A8B30786532196EDFD1D0AD4A21E2D