Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-01-28 21:22:57 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 553EEE07DD808F0118BB54CF1A3BAC46E4B381176F93408541E689592A1B23A3
Participant Details

Original Note:

Hilarious Pine Owl cites the Stanford Prison experiment as backing to the tweet. However, the Stanford Prison experiment has long been cited as being severely flawed and it's conclusions unsupported. https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2019-45337-001 https://www.livescience.com/62832-stanford-prison-experiment-flawed.html The note is not needed.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1619435381744623617
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 553EEE07DD808F0118BB54CF1A3BAC46E4B381176F93408541E689592A1B23A3
  • createdAtMillis - 1674940977996
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1619435381744623617553EEE07DD808F0118BB54CF1A3BAC46E4B381176F93408541E689592A1B23A3