Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-01-28 23:30:20 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 10600683514B54E5D68AEC65A1F31D5302CBE30BAC28276A64D35E0AA340D650
Participant Details

Original Note:

Hilarious Pine Owl cites the Stanford Prison experiment as backing to the tweet. However, the Stanford Prison experiment has long been cited as being severely flawed and it's conclusions unsupported. https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2019-45337-001 https://www.livescience.com/62832-stanford-prison-experiment-flawed.html The note is not needed.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1619435381744623617
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 10600683514B54E5D68AEC65A1F31D5302CBE30BAC28276A64D35E0AA340D650
  • createdAtMillis - 1674948620474
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 161943538174462361710600683514B54E5D68AEC65A1F31D5302CBE30BAC28276A64D35E0AA340D650