Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-01-25 00:17:27 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 7944E11C331A7E1859FD9665DBBB9DCB825A3D6F952EB3E3AED9363EB9C64D94
Participant Details

Original Note:

Suggested note misses the key point that it is clearly departmental policy for body cameras to be worn, as the photo documents. It is therefore suspicious that there is no footage of the shooting, and it is not a defense to point at the specific officers in this photo.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1617902129204576256
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 7944E11C331A7E1859FD9665DBBB9DCB825A3D6F952EB3E3AED9363EB9C64D94
  • createdAtMillis - 1674605847207
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 16179021292045762567944E11C331A7E1859FD9665DBBB9DCB825A3D6F952EB3E3AED9363EB9C64D94