Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-01-24 17:52:16 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 95819707FBCD93D5052352EA3BC3975C5789B78FF693EFE1749A0896AB00DC1D
Participant Details

Original Note:

Tweet quotes the newspaper headline exactly and then gives an opinion. No note needed as there is no attempt to mislead. Whilst there may be nuances in the data used in the study that the article is based on, there always are, these are best highlighted and discussed in replies.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1617594174940774423
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 95819707FBCD93D5052352EA3BC3975C5789B78FF693EFE1749A0896AB00DC1D
  • createdAtMillis - 1674582736270
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 161759417494077442395819707FBCD93D5052352EA3BC3975C5789B78FF693EFE1749A0896AB00DC1D