Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-01-23 19:04:19 UTC - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 49BF18B9E9F151774AC1F839011F4B79DB5DB7A2BAB7AD0DAE752624D49E3B76
Participant Details

Original Note:

Tweet quotes the newspaper headline exactly and then gives an opinion. No note needed as there is no attempt to mislead. Whilst there may be nuances in the data used in the study that the article is based on, there always are, these are best highlighted and discussed in replies.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1617594174940774423
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 49BF18B9E9F151774AC1F839011F4B79DB5DB7A2BAB7AD0DAE752624D49E3B76
  • createdAtMillis - 1674500659107
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 161759417494077442349BF18B9E9F151774AC1F839011F4B79DB5DB7A2BAB7AD0DAE752624D49E3B76