Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-01-24 08:12:05 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 0E43936C199B36356C4814E506F359218EF3C4719ACE0CEE2C3FAF261815EF71
Participant Details

Original Note:

Tweet quotes the newspaper headline exactly and then gives an opinion. No note needed as there is no attempt to mislead. Whilst there may be nuances in the data used in the study that the article is based on, there always are, these are best highlighted and discussed in replies.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1617594174940774423
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 0E43936C199B36356C4814E506F359218EF3C4719ACE0CEE2C3FAF261815EF71
  • createdAtMillis - 1674547925770
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 16175941749407744230E43936C199B36356C4814E506F359218EF3C4719ACE0CEE2C3FAF261815EF71