Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-01-23 01:33:40 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: E840113F2FD314985BC3B338F84DA6D89516894FD98AE953FDE6E5AB2B25B47E
Participant Details

Original Note:

Rasmussen Reports has a mixed historical accuracy. Some have reported favourably about their performance in the 2004 and 2006 general elections. There was later criticism about bias towards Republicans both in the polling results and questions. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rasmussen_Reports#Evaluations_of_accuracy_and_performance

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1617179848463499266
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - E840113F2FD314985BC3B338F84DA6D89516894FD98AE953FDE6E5AB2B25B47E
  • createdAtMillis - 1674437620184
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1617179848463499266E840113F2FD314985BC3B338F84DA6D89516894FD98AE953FDE6E5AB2B25B47E