Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-01-22 20:12:34 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 4FF132F5FC9B184E42DF3D5529C5344321574C7A0B24906A498ABEAE3CD32CFB
Participant Details

Original Note:

Rasmussen Reports has a mixed historical accuracy. Some have reported favourably about their performance in the 2004 and 2006 general elections. There was later criticism about bias towards Republicans both in the polling results and questions. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rasmussen_Reports#Evaluations_of_accuracy_and_performance

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1617179848463499266
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 4FF132F5FC9B184E42DF3D5529C5344321574C7A0B24906A498ABEAE3CD32CFB
  • createdAtMillis - 1674418354852
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 16171798484634992664FF132F5FC9B184E42DF3D5529C5344321574C7A0B24906A498ABEAE3CD32CFB