Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-01-22 20:12:39 UTC - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: CD518E8DF3EED955C4069D8E25E83616B171372691544ED5E864A2888FE01DEE
Participant Details

Original Note:

tweet is factually incorrect. The Op-Ed was ruled defamatory. jurors ruled that Heard defamed Depp with actual Malice. The judgment is entered into record & stands as the appeals have been withdrawn, due to a confidential agreement between parties. https://news.sky.com/story/amber-heard-files-appeal-against-johnny-depp-libel-trial-verdict-12762074 More info on court website

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1617161577555271682
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - CD518E8DF3EED955C4069D8E25E83616B171372691544ED5E864A2888FE01DEE
  • createdAtMillis - 1674418359099
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 1617161577555271682CD518E8DF3EED955C4069D8E25E83616B171372691544ED5E864A2888FE01DEE