Birdwatch Note Rating
2023-01-23 02:59:27 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: 87202886A4DF2FABC61F7ACEC2580CB0CBC09E4A2F5C0B647F55520E9B7DFF63
Participant Details
Original Note:
tweet is factually incorrect. The Op-Ed was ruled defamatory. jurors ruled that Heard defamed Depp with actual Malice. The judgment is entered into record & stands as the appeals have been withdrawn, due to a confidential agreement between parties. https://news.sky.com/story/amber-heard-files-appeal-against-johnny-depp-libel-trial-verdict-12762074 More info on court website
All Note Details