Birdwatch Note Rating
2023-01-22 14:27:51 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: 7A4A2D16B3513F8292E85DD49D11C8BFB4B54EDB2A2363FABA6B825B5D0F3B9C
Participant Details
Original Note:
tweet is factually incorrect. The Op-Ed was ruled defamatory. jurors ruled that Heard defamed Depp with actual Malice. The judgment is entered into record & stands as the appeals have been withdrawn, due to a confidential agreement between parties. https://news.sky.com/story/amber-heard-files-appeal-against-johnny-depp-libel-trial-verdict-12762074 More info on court website
All Note Details