Birdwatch Note Rating
2023-01-22 15:05:33 UTC - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: 49BF18B9E9F151774AC1F839011F4B79DB5DB7A2BAB7AD0DAE752624D49E3B76
Participant Details
Original Note:
tweet is factually incorrect. The Op-Ed was ruled defamatory. jurors ruled that Heard defamed Depp with actual Malice. The judgment is entered into record & stands as the appeals have been withdrawn, due to a confidential agreement between parties. https://news.sky.com/story/amber-heard-files-appeal-against-johnny-depp-libel-trial-verdict-12762074 More info on court website
All Note Details