Birdwatch Note Rating
2023-01-22 23:40:33 UTC - HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: 39F62F1073CCEF1D2810B09405AA2B7CEC58B2F0D4E5B84EF34E4EDC2BE50D26
Participant Details
Original Note:
tweet is factually incorrect. The Op-Ed was ruled defamatory. jurors ruled that Heard defamed Depp with actual Malice. The judgment is entered into record & stands as the appeals have been withdrawn, due to a confidential agreement between parties. https://news.sky.com/story/amber-heard-files-appeal-against-johnny-depp-libel-trial-verdict-12762074 More info on court website
All Note Details