Birdwatch Note Rating
2023-01-23 00:39:11 UTC - HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: 306A0DA41CAAE9AE1C6CD4D9991D1DA62C54CE802AA5D279EA2FE4321DDE3599
Participant Details
Original Note:
tweet is factually incorrect. The Op-Ed was ruled defamatory. jurors ruled that Heard defamed Depp with actual Malice. The judgment is entered into record & stands as the appeals have been withdrawn, due to a confidential agreement between parties. https://news.sky.com/story/amber-heard-files-appeal-against-johnny-depp-libel-trial-verdict-12762074 More info on court website
All Note Details