Birdwatch Note Rating
2023-01-23 00:13:07 UTC - HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: 267E09E809C39B7668E0BE1BA1AB1573D1D843B7AC8148010C1428F31306D835
Participant Details
Original Note:
tweet is factually incorrect. The Op-Ed was ruled defamatory. jurors ruled that Heard defamed Depp with actual Malice. The judgment is entered into record & stands as the appeals have been withdrawn, due to a confidential agreement between parties. https://news.sky.com/story/amber-heard-files-appeal-against-johnny-depp-libel-trial-verdict-12762074 More info on court website
All Note Details