Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-01-22 03:17:11 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: C220A865842C4DB5B1203CDB36991556B5AFF7B899A6F1389A25C38E33ACAC67
Participant Details

Original Note:

This tweet is an expressed opinion. No note needed. Counter opinions are best expressed in replies for earnest discussion. The most effective means to discover truthful things is through thoughtful, respectful and earnest discourse. Neutral language is preferred. https://academic.oup.com/bioscience/article/64/8/719/2754210?login=false

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1616837286968332288
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - C220A865842C4DB5B1203CDB36991556B5AFF7B899A6F1389A25C38E33ACAC67
  • createdAtMillis - 1674357431717
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 1
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 1
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1616837286968332288C220A865842C4DB5B1203CDB36991556B5AFF7B899A6F1389A25C38E33ACAC67