Birdwatch Archive - Rating Details

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-01-22 16:34:44 UTC - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 7DE651CA0CAFEBFFAFD7CD664508D99137BE0C6412C88E8C2B7D0A0CDC7DC5DA
Participant Details

Original Note:

This tweet is an expressed opinion. No note needed. Counter opinions are best expressed in replies for earnest discussion. The most effective means to discover truthful things is through thoughtful, respectful and earnest discourse. Neutral language is preferred. https://academic.oup.com/bioscience/article/64/8/719/2754210?login=false

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

noteId - 1616837286968332288
participantId -
raterParticipantId - 7DE651CA0CAFEBFFAFD7CD664508D99137BE0C6412C88E8C2B7D0A0CDC7DC5DA
createdAtMillis - 1674405284251
version - 2
agree - 0
disagree - 0
helpful - 0
notHelpful - 0
helpfulnessLevel - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL
helpfulOther - 1
helpfulInformative - 0
helpfulClear - 0
helpfulEmpathetic - 0
helpfulGoodSources - 0
helpfulUniqueContext - 0
helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
helpfulImportantContext - 0
helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
notHelpfulOther - 0
notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
notHelpfulOutdated - 0
notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
ratingsId - 16168372869683322887DE651CA0CAFEBFFAFD7CD664508D99137BE0C6412C88E8C2B7D0A0CDC7DC5DA