Birdwatch Archive - Rating Details

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-01-22 18:12:35 UTC - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 60A1F6A2F4CFB56CBFA55A39FFE6D9DF76386A1E7BFCAFB15817BA92C86D8FD4
Participant Details

Original Note:

This tweet is an expressed opinion. No note needed. Counter opinions are best expressed in replies for earnest discussion. The most effective means to discover truthful things is through thoughtful, respectful and earnest discourse. Neutral language is preferred. https://academic.oup.com/bioscience/article/64/8/719/2754210?login=false

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

noteId - 1616837286968332288
participantId -
raterParticipantId - 60A1F6A2F4CFB56CBFA55A39FFE6D9DF76386A1E7BFCAFB15817BA92C86D8FD4
createdAtMillis - 1674411155472
version - 2
agree - 0
disagree - 0
helpful - 0
notHelpful - 0
helpfulnessLevel - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL
helpfulOther - 0
helpfulInformative - 0
helpfulClear - 0
helpfulEmpathetic - 0
helpfulGoodSources - 0
helpfulUniqueContext - 0
helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
helpfulImportantContext - 0
helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
notHelpfulOther - 0
notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
notHelpfulOutdated - 0
notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
ratingsId - 161683728696833228860A1F6A2F4CFB56CBFA55A39FFE6D9DF76386A1E7BFCAFB15817BA92C86D8FD4