Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-01-23 03:10:13 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 4A8DCD9A72DF34CA067FE1164A0F4CA299FA87C26F2469101F8F4D58F6160C2E
Participant Details

Original Note:

This tweet is an expressed opinion. No note needed. Counter opinions are best expressed in replies for earnest discussion. The most effective means to discover truthful things is through thoughtful, respectful and earnest discourse. Neutral language is preferred. https://academic.oup.com/bioscience/article/64/8/719/2754210?login=false

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1616837286968332288
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 4A8DCD9A72DF34CA067FE1164A0F4CA299FA87C26F2469101F8F4D58F6160C2E
  • createdAtMillis - 1674443413376
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 1
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 16168372869683322884A8DCD9A72DF34CA067FE1164A0F4CA299FA87C26F2469101F8F4D58F6160C2E