Birdwatch Archive - Rating Details

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-01-22 13:52:50 UTC - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 08E18ECBCFA073CBAC9B9ABF483A068E1A417BEAD1CD4B8C0BC8DAF36D78C784
Participant Details

Original Note:

This tweet is an expressed opinion. No note needed. Counter opinions are best expressed in replies for earnest discussion. The most effective means to discover truthful things is through thoughtful, respectful and earnest discourse. Neutral language is preferred. https://academic.oup.com/bioscience/article/64/8/719/2754210?login=false

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

noteId - 1616837286968332288
participantId -
raterParticipantId - 08E18ECBCFA073CBAC9B9ABF483A068E1A417BEAD1CD4B8C0BC8DAF36D78C784
createdAtMillis - 1674395570745
version - 2
agree - 0
disagree - 0
helpful - 0
notHelpful - 0
helpfulnessLevel - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL
helpfulOther - 0
helpfulInformative - 0
helpfulClear - 1
helpfulEmpathetic - 0
helpfulGoodSources - 0
helpfulUniqueContext - 0
helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
helpfulImportantContext - 0
helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
notHelpfulOther - 0
notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
notHelpfulOutdated - 0
notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
ratingsId - 161683728696833228808E18ECBCFA073CBAC9B9ABF483A068E1A417BEAD1CD4B8C0BC8DAF36D78C784