Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-01-26 06:17:14 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: B35FEC9D7D5AD9E62A3275F7FA7C70C359713A4E241BEDA1DB693CD54F75CCDD
Participant Details

Original Note:

The previous notes discrediting the NYT as a source, failed to read the article. The actual source it's an analysis from the Integrity Institute. And no, is not an opinion, is an actual study. https://integrityinstitute.org/our-ideas/hear-from-our-fellows/misinformation-amplification-tracking-dashboard

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1616466270047567873
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - B35FEC9D7D5AD9E62A3275F7FA7C70C359713A4E241BEDA1DB693CD54F75CCDD
  • createdAtMillis - 1674713834803
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 1616466270047567873B35FEC9D7D5AD9E62A3275F7FA7C70C359713A4E241BEDA1DB693CD54F75CCDD