Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-01-20 15:57:35 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 55C945D161C2FF1A6143C2B4FCC09879AA6A0E7F3FF1F3E65648DB25A6ED9ED6
Participant Details

Original Note:

Not misleading as it’s a personal stance given the context of the situation. Other note is unnecessarily disparaging Tweet author.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1616236443520892930
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 55C945D161C2FF1A6143C2B4FCC09879AA6A0E7F3FF1F3E65648DB25A6ED9ED6
  • createdAtMillis - 1674230255461
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 161623644352089293055C945D161C2FF1A6143C2B4FCC09879AA6A0E7F3FF1F3E65648DB25A6ED9ED6