Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-01-18 03:08:28 UTC - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: F3C296A879A8E10B4B5C5A50FFB8E44DE76AB146ADBDCC534E66CE03A347AE5A
Participant Details

Original Note:

The other note here appears to be partisan in nature and purely defends Justin Trudeau. It does not refute each of the claims. And disagreement on policy or interpretation of which (halt / claw back) and so on is best reserved for comments.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1615545503374274560
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - F3C296A879A8E10B4B5C5A50FFB8E44DE76AB146ADBDCC534E66CE03A347AE5A
  • createdAtMillis - 1674011308800
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1615545503374274560F3C296A879A8E10B4B5C5A50FFB8E44DE76AB146ADBDCC534E66CE03A347AE5A