Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-01-10 20:07:33 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: A420F69E7DD268BDE09289B1B9E60489B4FB0DC71494B85B9CD619C111B35627
Participant Details

Original Note:

There is no scientific evidence for earthquake predictions. There is always a chance for earthquakes in places with active faults, but specific predictions perform no better than random when tested. "Megaquakes" are not physically possible. More from scientists: https://www.usgs.gov/faqs/can-you-predict-earthquakes https://www.usgs.gov/faqs/can-megaquakes-really-happen-magnitude-10-or-larger https://scienceexchange.caltech.edu/topics/earthquakes/earthquakes-probabilities https://pnsn.org/outreach/faq/earthquake-prediction https://sitn.hms.harvard.edu/flash/2019/predicting-next-big-earthquake/ https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/can-we-predict-earthquakes-at-all1/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1612902113499316226
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - A420F69E7DD268BDE09289B1B9E60489B4FB0DC71494B85B9CD619C111B35627
  • createdAtMillis - 1673381253496
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1612902113499316226A420F69E7DD268BDE09289B1B9E60489B4FB0DC71494B85B9CD619C111B35627