Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-01-09 23:52:44 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 5E1167E8A1FD4039DB932F74E7FDE99AA532F582CA4A4CC6C39FDB25B43D739E
Participant Details

Original Note:

While the author’s replies make me think twice, it is nonetheless worth noting that satire- including ridicule- is listed among Birdwatch’s reasons a tweet is not misleading. This appears to be clear ridicule of the political drive to associate LGBT+ folk with child grooming

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1612570600597524480
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 5E1167E8A1FD4039DB932F74E7FDE99AA532F582CA4A4CC6C39FDB25B43D739E
  • createdAtMillis - 1673308364194
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 16125706005975244805E1167E8A1FD4039DB932F74E7FDE99AA532F582CA4A4CC6C39FDB25B43D739E