Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-01-10 00:20:37 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 30B99AC000A6172CE393CCA4D84C7CDEC6CE7C42241EC6F17557A3B1AD36E3C5
Participant Details

Original Note:

While the author’s replies make me think twice, it is nonetheless worth noting that satire- including ridicule- is listed among Birdwatch’s reasons a tweet is not misleading. This appears to be clear ridicule of the political drive to associate LGBT+ folk with child grooming

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1612570600597524480
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 30B99AC000A6172CE393CCA4D84C7CDEC6CE7C42241EC6F17557A3B1AD36E3C5
  • createdAtMillis - 1673310037780
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 161257060059752448030B99AC000A6172CE393CCA4D84C7CDEC6CE7C42241EC6F17557A3B1AD36E3C5