Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-01-06 02:40:38 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: E77A83910C2AEB5333AFD81CC51E4A240C5D281280E47672740290C46CF8AFFA
Participant Details

Original Note:

Looking at the Acknowledgements in "The Population Bomb", it doesn't appear to have undergone any sort of formal peer review process. Numerous reviewers are mentioned, but they are not anonymous, and Ehrlich doesn't indicate that their concerns were all addressed: http://pinguet.free.fr/ehrlich68.pdf

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1611088993273401344
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - E77A83910C2AEB5333AFD81CC51E4A240C5D281280E47672740290C46CF8AFFA
  • createdAtMillis - 1672972838165
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1611088993273401344E77A83910C2AEB5333AFD81CC51E4A240C5D281280E47672740290C46CF8AFFA