Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-01-21 22:46:21 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: C3107491F78FC9AB0D9083B98380E19B11D1289305B3C767CC2192EFB9F8E31D
Participant Details

Original Note:

Looking at the Acknowledgements in "The Population Bomb", it doesn't appear to have undergone any sort of formal peer review process. Numerous reviewers are mentioned, but they are not anonymous, and Ehrlich doesn't indicate that their concerns were all addressed: http://pinguet.free.fr/ehrlich68.pdf

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1611088993273401344
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - C3107491F78FC9AB0D9083B98380E19B11D1289305B3C767CC2192EFB9F8E31D
  • createdAtMillis - 1674341181079
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1611088993273401344C3107491F78FC9AB0D9083B98380E19B11D1289305B3C767CC2192EFB9F8E31D