Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-01-05 20:17:56 UTC - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 223AD3C78D7D9F2D17E421E5104FD6600A72B17FC120A2C3B8D6D02378F3B7EB
Participant Details

Original Note:

Looking at the Acknowledgements in "The Population Bomb", it doesn't appear to have undergone any sort of formal peer review process. Numerous reviewers are mentioned, but they are not anonymous, and Ehrlich doesn't indicate that their concerns were all addressed: http://pinguet.free.fr/ehrlich68.pdf

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1611088993273401344
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 223AD3C78D7D9F2D17E421E5104FD6600A72B17FC120A2C3B8D6D02378F3B7EB
  • createdAtMillis - 1672949876028
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1611088993273401344223AD3C78D7D9F2D17E421E5104FD6600A72B17FC120A2C3B8D6D02378F3B7EB