Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-01-02 17:46:16 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: E66AB1C2B91213E0DE626C1D52588AC064C35A2EF00317037ED9D4DA2008E753
Participant Details

Original Note:

"Good for the environment" isn't a useful measure in this case. Any extraction or manufacturing is potentially "bad" for the environment. If this tweet's intent is to say that EVs are worse than gasoline powered vehicles then it fails factually. https://theness.com/neurologicablog/index.php/electric-vehicles-by-the-numbers/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1609830529091907585
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - E66AB1C2B91213E0DE626C1D52588AC064C35A2EF00317037ED9D4DA2008E753
  • createdAtMillis - 1672681576623
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 1609830529091907585E66AB1C2B91213E0DE626C1D52588AC064C35A2EF00317037ED9D4DA2008E753