Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-01-02 23:39:52 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: C740DE02E733BBEA4FEF3BF7631F532E2CFD3DEC38BA9790C01078EC3F946ED4
Participant Details

Original Note:

"Good for the environment" isn't a useful measure in this case. Any extraction or manufacturing is potentially "bad" for the environment. If this tweet's intent is to say that EVs are worse than gasoline powered vehicles then it fails factually. https://theness.com/neurologicablog/index.php/electric-vehicles-by-the-numbers/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1609830529091907585
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - C740DE02E733BBEA4FEF3BF7631F532E2CFD3DEC38BA9790C01078EC3F946ED4
  • createdAtMillis - 1672702792573
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 1
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1609830529091907585C740DE02E733BBEA4FEF3BF7631F532E2CFD3DEC38BA9790C01078EC3F946ED4