Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2022-12-27 14:56:44 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 9F9FA91FB5C32CA4F992EBF4E32A32FADD6FAAC3D5F0F32B1729330EF3555EC3
Participant Details

Original Note:

This article was published on a site that wants to "serve as a hub for sceptical articles, academic papers and interviews that had appeared elsewhere, as well as a place for experts and non-experts to air views they couldn’t get published anywhere else." - https://dailysceptic.org/about/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1607694916808839170
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 9F9FA91FB5C32CA4F992EBF4E32A32FADD6FAAC3D5F0F32B1729330EF3555EC3
  • createdAtMillis - 1672153004854
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 16076949168088391709F9FA91FB5C32CA4F992EBF4E32A32FADD6FAAC3D5F0F32B1729330EF3555EC3