Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2022-12-27 02:21:45 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: BCC6CA7842E592E0D0DF56419B33F7BD3E1EC9BB6333247B7FDEC8FB29584446
Participant Details

Original Note:

Having previously dismissed eight other claims from Ms. Lake as not constituting grounds for an election challenge, the Judge in this case heard from multiple witnesses before dismissing the two remaining claims. The assertion fraud was “proved”, in any sense, is incorrect. https://thehill.com/homenews/campaign/3785655-judge-dismisses-remainder-of-kari-lakes-election-lawsuit-following-two-day-trial/amp/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1607181733924945921
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - BCC6CA7842E592E0D0DF56419B33F7BD3E1EC9BB6333247B7FDEC8FB29584446
  • createdAtMillis - 1672107705858
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1607181733924945921BCC6CA7842E592E0D0DF56419B33F7BD3E1EC9BB6333247B7FDEC8FB29584446