Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2022-12-26 21:15:55 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 8867BB3D5AADA51F0F159AFCB9A4096500C71D2D1D30CFDDDC78EF17B68F3E6D
Participant Details

Original Note:

Having previously dismissed eight other claims from Ms. Lake as not constituting grounds for an election challenge, the Judge in this case heard from multiple witnesses before dismissing the two remaining claims. The assertion fraud was “proved”, in any sense, is incorrect. https://thehill.com/homenews/campaign/3785655-judge-dismisses-remainder-of-kari-lakes-election-lawsuit-following-two-day-trial/amp/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1607181733924945921
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 8867BB3D5AADA51F0F159AFCB9A4096500C71D2D1D30CFDDDC78EF17B68F3E6D
  • createdAtMillis - 1672089355549
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 16071817339249459218867BB3D5AADA51F0F159AFCB9A4096500C71D2D1D30CFDDDC78EF17B68F3E6D